Not really, just saying that if there are so many leaks causing damages - questioning it is the least that can be done. May be the current capacity is enough and they could do more towards guaranteeing / eliminating leaks before building new ones. I don't know - just think that blindly accepting the leaks seems wrong.

They never suggested that. A simple cost-benefit analysis shows us that this pipeline simply isn't worth it.

So simple it can't be linked to?