Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
AOL Is Shutting Down AOL Music (techcrunch.com)
46 points by jonathanjaeger on April 26, 2013 | hide | past | favorite | 24 comments



WinAMP and ShoutCast are no longer a fit for AOL. This is most likely the writing on the wall for them. Sad because WinAMP is still a great product.


If you haven't already read it, this long Winamp retrospective from Ars last year is really worth it:

Winamp’s woes: how the greatest MP3 player undid itself

http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/06/winamp-how-greatest-...


> I'm hearing that Winamp/SHOUTcast are still intact.

https://twitter.com/jherskowitz/statuses/327865634924933120


I always imagined that nullsoft was angling to get immediately canned right after they leaked Gnutella into the wild.

I'm surprised they're still around.


Yeah, but how long will it last ?


WinAMP is a great product by the standards of 1998.


If "standards of 1998" means proper parsing and display of metadata in various character sets from various sources (local file, internet streams etc), wide input format support, gapless playback and Replaygain support, relatively low resource usage, instantaneous search and unrestricted customizability then I wished more music players followed them.


Foobar is my current end all and be all in these terms. It does all of that and is endlessly extensible.


I use FB2k too, though I had to adapt to its creator's hate for the "Now Playing" list, forcing media library browsers to maintain playlists instead.


You're right - it's an excellent product by today's standards. :)


Man... That's bad.Aol Music really has unique, good, high quality video content. For me the content was always hard to find, but when I found a star I wanted to watch/listen, I was amazed what exclusive videos they have had produced with that particular star.

- maybe I confuse Aol Sessions with Aol music - Aol sessions is great.


Live tweeting that you're getting fired seems like a terrible idea to me.


Why? Are they in danger of being fired for it?


There's a difference between being fired and being made redundant usually. (Although perhaps US terminology is different, in the UK usually "fired" refers to dismissal, redundancy is a different process with more compensation and a process employers must follow.)


The equivalent phrase here would probably be "laid off" but the definitions are a little fuzzy. People say "laid off" as a polite euphemism for fired and people use "fired" when they're upset about about being laud off.


Would you want to hire someone that live tweets everything that goes on at your firm? Most companies would rather not risk being held hostage (so to speak) by their employees if the management decides it needs to shut down a department or stop offering a product.


How did live tweeting that you're being fired get turned into "everything that goes on at your firm?"


I should have had the word 'potentially' in there.


The only reason I can think of that it'd be a terrible idea, is the company might then choose to be dicks about how they treat you post firing, regarding negotiations on benefits or any number of smaller details.


I wonder when we'll see "AOL is shutting down TechCrunch"


I read the headline and thought that HR was literally watching Twitter while the internel jumbles were going on, and any employees tweeting about it were being fired. I thought "how innovative and terrible of HR." Turns out, the headline was just a bit weird.


I thought the same. Should probably read "AOL Is Shutting Down AOL Music And Spinner; Staff Live-Tweet the Whole Thing"


The fact that they didn't write it that way makes it seem like a deliberately misleading headline.


I suspect they just omitted a comma; it should have been "AOL Is Shutting Down AOL Music And Firing Staff, Who Are Live-Tweeting The Bloodbath".




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: