Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is exactly the point being made. Threatening to veto unless minor changes are made is just a way of getting the public to accept a form of something they previously opposed entirely on principle. As the previous commenter said, it's a strategy to erode public opposition. NDAA was augmented and yet indefinite detention without charge is a reality.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: