Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You can take steps to reduce carbon emissions in cars (smaller car, drive more efficiently, etc), but you can't with planes other than not flying. Luckily, it's in the best interest of airlines to reduce emissions since that means less jet fuel and more profits.



Indeed, this is true. Thanks for this. The realization that it is also in the best interest of an airline to reduce emissions, especially as the price of oil increases, really helps make me feel better.

Not flying doesn't really reduce emissions though... Those planes are going to fly whether or not you are on it.


> The realization that it is also in the best interest of an airline to reduce emissions, especially as the price of oil increases, really helps make me feel better.

The new Dreamliner jet is a good example of this (once they solve the battery problem and can fly the sucker...). It's massively more efficient than its predecessors (20% more efficient than the 767 according to Boeing). That's a huge jump.


>Not flying doesn't really reduce emissions though... Those planes are going to fly whether or not you are on it.

On an individual level, sure, but not flying reduces demand, which in turn reduces the number of flights.


> On an individual level, sure, but not flying reduces demand, which in turn reduces the number of flights.

Try to get flights from London to Paris or from Paris to Lyon. Not flying stops planes from flying very quickly.


Of course it does reduce emissions. Increasing demand for flights means the airlines fly more planes.


Not flying doesn't really reduce emissions though... Those planes are going to fly whether or not you are on it.

This is an extreme example of tragedy of the commons type thinking. Why bother doing anything because someone else will do it anyways?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: