Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance."

What if something can't be adequately explained by ignorance?




Perhaps it should be, "Assume ignorance before malice".


Then complain loudly and repeatedly that someone had the effrontery to attribute...


Then you'll have to find another explanation. Was this question really necessary?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: