Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

one flaw on the estimates: it assume 100% of the uses leave the popunder running.

anyone have any data on the effectiveness of popunders? this is one area i never have to deal with (thankfully)




Effectiveness? Like click-through rate? It's irrelevant in this model, really.

The popunder loads the page that loads all of the other ad-clicking domain pages, and since it's a popunder it's probably not noticed until the browser has loaded the entire contents.

It's damn brilliant. Paying $3k for low-end $500k? That's a great ROI.


my point is: how many people even let the popupunder load?

i visit a few forums that have popunders for the first sessio n click. it's almost a knee jerk reaction to close the window while i wait for the forum index to load.

He is making the assumption that 100% of the visits translates to a popunder being able to do it's thing. I just want to know if the real world the number is 99% or 10%.


The described scheme has nothing to do with popunders really. A hidden iframe is loaded in which the advertisers ad is "displayed" and the publisher gets payed on cpm. The user doesn't even get to see the ad.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: