Sun were always a bit wary about the Java trademark after their tangle with Microsoft. That may be part of the issue, but honestly I think it's more likely to be down to the random bureaucracy of the JSR and JCP efforts.
I really don't buy the conspiracy theory and I'm puzzled to see the article up-voted so high without comment.
I'm much more interested in the question of what will actually arrive in Java/JDK7 and whether they'll ever move to a faster release cycle than the current geological process.
It's not so much a conspiracy theory as a well documented public argument between Apache and Sun. You can decide who's right, but there's neither conspiracy nor theory there.
I disagree. It is a conspiracy theory about the implications of the naming conventions currently being used by Sun.
The "argument" between Apache and Sun is hardly well documented. He cites a two year old open letter from Apache to Sun, and then in a follow-up article indulges in a great deal of armchair lawyering.
The cited links to Sun developer blogs don't seem to support the argument being made one jot.
I really don't buy the conspiracy theory and I'm puzzled to see the article up-voted so high without comment.
I'm much more interested in the question of what will actually arrive in Java/JDK7 and whether they'll ever move to a faster release cycle than the current geological process.