Yes, because it's been handled in a food chain that deals with a lot of wheat products.
> The elisa test is also flawed - there are situations in which it can't detect hydrolized gluten.
Yes, but it's the best available for wide-scale screening.
> Trace amounts of gluten due to cross contamination may not be enough to cause people significant problems.
The standard is ten parts per million.
> You don't have to be 100% gluten free to derive benefits from it.
If you want to claim to be gluten free you do.
Yes, because it's been handled in a food chain that deals with a lot of wheat products.
> The elisa test is also flawed - there are situations in which it can't detect hydrolized gluten.
Yes, but it's the best available for wide-scale screening.
> Trace amounts of gluten due to cross contamination may not be enough to cause people significant problems.
The standard is ten parts per million.
> You don't have to be 100% gluten free to derive benefits from it.
If you want to claim to be gluten free you do.