Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ah, the open source advocate! The type who doesn't really care about freedom, who only cares about what is pragmatic in the short-term.

RMS isn't being extremist in this case at all. Your only two options are to fully enable or disable JavaScript. That's not much of a choice because if you enable JavaScript you let in some company's proprietary code to be run on your machine. Imagine you're coding a Free Software Javascript library and the proprietary competitor's product is run on your machine. They can prove that you've run their code, and maybe you looked at it and now you're setup for copyright infringement.

If you fully disable Javascript with NoScript, then you won't be able to run "safe" Javascript.

Two choices that are both extreme. The real extremism is in the web browser that doesn't allow you to create a blacklist/whitelist or to use replacement JavaScript.



>> "Imagine you're coding a Free Software Javascript library and the proprietary competitor's product is run on your machine. They can prove that you've run their code, and maybe you looked at it and now you're setup for copyright infringement."

Sure, most people using GMail or Google docs are programming open source javascript libraries on the side..... Very common I'm sure :/

If you're programming an open source js library and you're worried about a webapp suing you, don't use it?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: