Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> At some point we should be able to do a VAX

You mean a processor where all of the complex opcodes are implemented in loadable microcode?




That's the one! I happen to have what is a fairly complete collection of all of the 'chip' VAX cpus (for Qbus) starting with the KA610 (MicroVAX I), through the KA692 (VAX 4000/700a), and its fascinating to watch the architecture go from a nearly pure microcode implementation to a nearly pure 'gate' implementation. From the perspective of looking at the tradeoffs of microcode vs gates it is really an excellent tutorial on computer architecture.


If we want a microcoded architecture, I'd prefer the PDP-10, but that's me.

How much more complex is a mostly-microcode VAX implementation compared to a MIPS? The point about being able to move stepwise up the hardware complexity ladder by progressively replacing microcode with gates is a really good one, though.


> I'd prefer the PDP-10

yeah, or a Foonly...


You're thinking of the Perq (http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~pmaydell/PERQ/). The VAX was probably implemented with microcode, but it wasn't that modifiable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: