Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No, bad thing.

Because this didn't exist in the 20's, the government started adding poison to alcohol not intended for drinking -- because people were drinking it, predictably, and bootleggers were reselling it to be consumed -- and killed thousands of people in the process.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_exa...

Denatured alcohol still does nasty things to people who are ignorant and/or desperate enough to try not-for-consumption alcohol... fortunately it's not so deadly nowadays (I think?).




This is still done today. Acetaminophen s added to Vicodin specifically to make it destroy your liver if you take too much. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/archevore/201103/tylenol...


If something is labeled "do not drink this - poisonous" then whose fault is it that you drink it?


Blame doesn't rest in one location only, does it?

Obviously the people drinking alcohol in liquids not meant for consumption aren't in normal rational states of mind; but yes, they're doing something really stupid. But suppose when you're "denaturing" the alcohol in your product, you have the choice to use a substance that will make it taste very bad and cause vomiting; or a substance that will make people die, or at least go blind. Which should you choose?

Next, suppose that the alcohol was stolen and resold by a bootlegger and thus has no warning (beyond the government's warnings that buying illegal alcohol is dangerous, which had already been going on for some time).




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: