> > Also, for a dynamically typed language, I thought it had too many di... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

JadeNB on Feb 1, 2013 | parent | context | favorite | on: Racket v5.3.2

> > Also, for a dynamically typed language, I thought it had too many different types.

> You can also used a typed dialect of Racket if that's easier

I'm not sure that proposing a move to a typed dialect will solve a problem with too many different types. :-)

tikhonj on Feb 1, 2013 [–]

Actually, I think it would. The problem is not too many types per se, but too many types without a good way of managing them. All a static type system is is a good way to manage types!

Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact