Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In the philosophic sense, no!

In the we live in the real world sense, absolutely.

The US gets to enforce US law around the world because they have more guns. You'll notice that when the USSR was around there were a group of countries with a vastly different system because the USSR had enough guns to force the people of those countries to play along.

The International Criminal Court is an even better example, the US is not a signatory to the ICC but can recommend other non-signatories to be prosecuted by the ICC while at the same time denying the ICC rules apply to the US.

Might absolutely makes right because those with out might are unable to enforce their decisions. Ortiz lives by politics she can die by politics, I'm sure she's experienced enough to realize the realpolitik ways of the world. She's no innocent bystander in the corruption of the American justice system.



In your post, I see a lot of examples of why might makes might, but that's hardly new information.


It's never new information. Reality has been a harsh, harsh mistress for decades and decades now.

It's what makes debating with ideological idealists so contentious IMO. There's no way to convince them to settle for anything other than "what's right", even if the only way to get to that state is to first settle for gradually less-wrong states in between.

Even RMS had the pragmatism to start developing GNU on a proprietary OS with proprietary tools.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: