Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Calling whatever is going on with that website "petitions" is a pretty misleading move, and it has been from the start. The "petitions" carry even less weight than ones gathered manually by interest groups, and they certainly carry absolutely no weight if you compare them to legally necessary petitions (such as putting candidates on ballots).

What (now) 100k votes gets you is a guaranteed response from a White House spokesperson. That's all. For a WH person to even look at a few sentences of text, it takes 100k people. For the most part, neither petitioners nor the spokesperson take those things seriously. As it is, a petition carries less weight than a reporter asking a third-tier aide a policy question.

I'm sure someone at the WH has made the argument internally already if something appears on the "petition" website, that's a pretty good indicator not to do whatever is asked.

The "petition" site is also a genius move as far as fake openness and the illusion grassroots democracy goes because it neatly captures and binds both crackpots and armchair activists in a safe bundle where they are guaranteed to have absolutely no impact whatsoever. Politics is not made by internet people, nor is politics made for people in any way.



>What (now) 100k votes gets you is a guaranteed response from a White House spokesperson.

And it might even be customized for your exact case, rather than "form letter gun control response #27".


True. I'm not really suggesting the site is a bad idea, but I think people should bear in mind it's essentially just a Q&A.


I also take issue with the name of the site.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: