Actually, I added to it. Sorry you took it the wrong way. I merely mentioned that HN had picked it up, and that the Australian media monitors the website. I think it might have been the "not to mention it" bits I put into the post that might have been misconstrued... I guess I didn't realize they'd be seen as aggressive. That was not my intent!

None of these points had been brought up before, so I'd hardly call that a "zero content response".

Peace, I wasn't throwing stones. And I don't see how it's helpful to any conversation on HN...