Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Why Atlanta Should Be Your Next Startup HQ (miter.mit.edu)
36 points by azsromej on Dec 9, 2012 | hide | past | favorite | 57 comments



As someone from Atlanta, I can confirm that there is a growing interest in start-ups (or at least at GT there was). My goal after grad school is to start a company; I just don't know in what yet :)

I should mention that it's difficult to characterize all people in Atlanta under one sort of personality type. In my experience, it varies wildly. Atlanta is more of a commuter city where a lot of people from the suburban area surrounding it drive to work each day. Of those who actually live in the city, I believe liberal is more frequent (particularly in the Midtown area), but again, there is a wide variety.

Atlanta has a reputation for crime, but this has actually improved significantly since the Olympics and I don't believe Atlanta is any worse than other big cities now.

There's also a variety of things to do in Atlanta. Some examples including the High Museum of Art and many local jazz clubs. There's also a number of outdoorsy things. Two prominent bike trails (Silver Comet and Freedom/Stone Mountain trail) + a new one they're building through Atlanta called the Beltline.


I also live, work, and have grown up in Atlanta. I have to say he gives a realistic and well made argument. I'd personally rather live/work in Atlanta over Austin, but the culture of Atlanta, while improving, is nowhere near the likes of San Fran or NYC.

But there have been many successful start ups through out Atlanta's history, such as Coke, Turner Broadcasting System(CNN/Turner/etc), UPS, and more. All of these were revolutionary start ups at the time, and now are massive corporations. I expect future companies like this to be founded here in Atlanta, because it is essentially the capital of the South East, geographically about a quarter of the country.

What makes me want to move away from Atlanta is the poor city infrastructure, the dependence on suburbs, and the lack of culture. In Atlanta there is possibly less muse than in San Fran or NYC, and the city as a whole can sometimes come across as anti intellectual, which is quite the opposite of most of San Fran and NYC. Beside GA Tech and Emory college students, networking would be relatively small when compared to NYC or San Fran. But for someone who already has their network built out, such as a start up from SF/NYC trying to cut costs, Atlanta could be the place. And it's also ideal for people moving from smaller cities who don't want the large city feel.

If Atlanta had a more walkable and livable environment, it's be quite amazing.


I grew up in Atlanta, moved to Los Angeles 11 years ago.

The Atlanta suburbs were awful for me. Bland, completely unplanned messes dominated by big box stores with massive parking lots and endless subdivisions of cookie-cutter houses.

But the city was pretty cool. The Midtown-Little 5 Points-Candler Park axis was quite livable, with plenty to recommend it day and night. If I ever moved back, it would be to that part of town. Most jobs, though, tend towards the suburbs. And most of the cheap housing.

Traffic is bad there, but nowhere near LA or DC bad. Maybe like Bay Area 101 bad.

There's some geeky culture there, particularly geeky pop culture. Dragoncon, big anime community. Science/Tech geekwise there's a fair amount. GaTech and Emory, of course, and the CDC draw their share of talent. Lots of my friends or spouses worked in places like that.

Art culturewise there's not a lot. A solid underground band scene, you could see good hardworking indie bar bands nightly if you wanted. A world-class but underappreciated symphony. So-so art museum. Great archaeology museum at Emory, better than anything LA has. Gallery scene is eh. Theater scene is eh. Some film culture, but spotty. Decent foodie culture, though not on the scale of a major foodie hub. A much, much, much more vibrant LGBT culture than you might expect.

A good number of outdoorsy people. Appalachian Mountains with tons of trails, rock climbing, kayaking, serious caving. Finding people to backpack with was never a problem. Hunting and fishing culture strong too, of course.

Crime wasn't all that bad. I spent a lot of time out and about in the city itself late at night. I never really felt unsafe, but then I knew the city intimately. Did some construction work in housing projects for a summer job, that was pretty sketchy at times. My brother saw a running shootout doing the same work. But that kind of thing was very limited to very specific areas.

For me it'd be the best place to live between DC and New Orleans, but there are a number of other places I prefer.


The anti-intellectual nature is quite frustrating at times and outside of a few pockets is something that could benefit from more intellectuals coming into the area.


It's not "anti-intellectual", it's a refreshing dose of anti-snotty-ism (not typically synonymous with cities containing top research universities).


I agree, there is very little snotty-ism compared to other cities. And one would not feel the 'anti-intellectual' nature of the city if working in certain environments, such as GATech, Emory, CDC, ect. Atlanta is a great city, and for many people may be the best, but to compare it to San Fran and NYC, there is still much room for improvement on many areas. GATech is just awesome though.


>Atlanta has a reputation for crime,

Atlanta's population swells by 50% during the day.

This causes massive crime rate distortion issues (aka, using night population figures, aka, people with the actual address of the city on their driver's license, when really day population figures are much more appropriate for daylight crimes during the week).


How can I get more connected? I live in the suburb and it's quite difficult and the traffic through Atlanta is a pain...


Xcelerate, shoot me a tweet to talk startups (@melonakos)


Unrelated, but there's something at least mildly amusing about "shooting a tweet". With email it was just a metaphor for sending a message quickly/lightly. Shooting a tweet makes me think of picking off tiny birds (tweets) a la skeet shooting. Carry on ;)


Yeah, I started by saying shoot an email, but realized I didn't want to post my email address here :)


I do post my email here (profile) and would love to chat with some HN people around Atlanta and/or GT.


Costs are low enough in Atlanta that you can actually start your business without raising capital. Unthinkable, at least for an extended period of time, in most other cities.

Most businesses shouldn't raise money either because they're not going to grow fast enough to fit the VC model or they're going to dilute the founders so much that the wind gets sucked out of the sails. For example, learn from an Atlantan that just sold his Pardot no-investor-raised-money business for $95 million, http://davidcummings.org/2010/05/08/when-raising-money-makes....


Here's the Google cached text-only version:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:MPoNN4t...


I live in Atlanta and work with startups here.

Compared to where it was a few years ago it is doing a lot better.

With that being said it still isn't there yet. All of the points that the author made are valid ones.

The plusses of being in Atlanta: 1. Costs are generally lower. 2. There are some good resources for startups if you know where to look. 3. We have had a few successful exits in this town and we are getting a better tech startup buzz. 4. You have a major airport hub and can get to anywhere in the country quickly and inexpensively. 5. We are beginning to get more traction with setting up hackathons and tech focused groups in the town. 6. There are a few quality companies that have recently come out of flashpoint.

Opportunities for growth: 1. Atlanta Has not traditionally been a tech focused town. Finance, Marketing, Retail and Media have been it's dominate industries. IT has been more of a support function of those industries. 2. Atlanta investors are not as savvy as investors from tech hubs like Austin, the Valley and New York which makes it more difficult to raise money locally (a lot of startups have gone to one of those cities to raise money). 3. The resources in Atlanta do not seem to be as focused on creating tech centered startups as they could be. If you look at the programs offered at the ATDC etc. they tend to be focused on business development, product development, operations (legal things etc.) and marketing. Many of the startup events are filled with non-technical people with no money looking for co-founders for their latest social/gaming/store based app. 4. The community feels like it needs to gel and circle around the quality startups in town to drive a culture of quality....there are some low quality (me too) startups in town with non-technical founders and no money who have received way too much press/buzz that predictably have or will fail.

Many of the opportunities for growth are not unique to Atlanta. This is probably also indicative of the small number of companies in Crunchbase that are out of Atlanta.

The trajectory is going in the right direction, and if we can reach the critical mass it could be great....so in a way Atlanta is still a startup of startups.


I think Atlanta has much to recommend in terms of a startup destination: great access to smart engineers (Georgia Tech is in the city, Duke and UNC are not too far away), low cost of living, quite livable, etc.

However, it's just so tremendously isolated. The closest real city with a real financial/tech sector is Charlotte, but the transit interconnection between the two is very weak and as a result there is very little cultural cross-pollination between the two cities (unlike say DC and New York which are about the same distance apart).

I think Philadelphia is actually a smarter bet. Low cost of living, like Atlanta, Penn and Drexel right in the city, and just 90 minutes on the train to either New York or DC. The amount of cross-pollination in the DC-PHL-NYC corridor is just phenomenal, enhanced by the fact that the three cities have very different cultures and host very different types of industries.


Having just moved after 6 years in Philadelphia: very high violent crime, and corrupt local government w/ no interest in technology; rents are lower compared to DC or NYC but raising rapidly. While I loved going to the Philly tech meetups, most everyone was working in the suburbs, where companies are free of the high city corporate tax rate (most cities don't _have_ corporate taxes).


Atlanta can probably rival Philly when it comes to violent crime and corrupt institutions.


Every city has pockets that are bad and pockets that are safe. Atlanta has tons of safe places.


I fatfinger voted on this comment (when I wasn't intending to vote at all). I don't know if it was an upvote or downvote. Whoops! and sorry.


Crime is a downside, but it's also one that's not uniformly distributed throughout the city. And to be fair, Atlanta isn't a low-crime city either.


Emory University is also in Atlanta. Definitely some smart people there.


> Most entrepreneurs rightly consider San Francisco to be the #1 city for starting a company

Most consumer-tech entrepreneurs with a US passport, maybe.


Isn't Atlanta a place with "strong traditions and moral values"? Which is Paul-Graham-speak for "an awful place for innovation"?


You must be confusing atlanta with georgia. between Ru Paul, Baton Bob, Ted Turner, Jane Fonda and Newt Gingrich, Atlanta is full of characters who have all but abandonned moral values.


I suppose it all depends on what you mean by that. The best phrase for describing Atlanta is probably "liberal suburban." That is to say that the dominant cultural phenomenon is middle/upper middle class whites (and in the Valley, Asians) with strong suburban upbringings living in a semi-urbanized area with liberal leanings, though ones that fall short of say San Francisco or New York.

One of the strong counter-forces to the otherwise suburban cultural norm that exists in Atlanta, but does not exist in Silicon Valley, is the strong professional urban black community. It's a phenomenon you'll see in literally no other city in the country--upscale retail/entertainment venues whose clientele is dominated by upper middle class blacks. Quite a distinctly un-suburban phenomenon.


I'm confused by Atlanta -- it seems like a very racially polarized place, but it's not split across wealth/professional status/etc. like the racial polarization in SFBA -- it's just parallel everything by race, which is even weirder. I actually know more black people in Atlanta than I know white people, since a lot of the black military officers I met (who tend to be middle or upper middle class, either going in or coming out) had some connection to Atlanta.

There seemed to be a lot of interest in business startups, but not the kind of scalable tech startups you would find in the Bay Area -- more like consultancies or other professional services. Still, a good way to a $200-300k/yr income. They may have been as much a "getting out of the Army" thing as an Atlanta thing, though.


Yes, parallel is the way to describe it. Not driven by racial animosity, I don't think, but just people keeping within their own circles (kind of like Jews and Asians in New York).

The interest in professional services makes sense when you consider that Delta, UPS, Home Depot, etc, are headquartered there. Logistics services, consulting, legal services, etc, are all in high demand, and the city is the hub for that sort of work for the surrounding region.


If you listen to people who say they "live in atlanta", most of them live 10-50 miles from it in a suburb.

The city itself? Please. It's probably the center of the hiphop universe, one of the most gay friendly cities around, and a fun place. It apparently also has some of the best strip clubs in the country, far beating LV. But I hate strip clubs, so just going to go by what friends/associates say.


One thing about the city itself- it's the magnet for anyone who might feel like they're the odd-man-out in their hometown anywhere else in the south. So you get quite a bit of diversity in the city.


Is innovation fueled by debauchery?


The opposite of "family values" is not "debauchery", despite what religious extremists would have you believe.


In fact, they often go hand-in-hand :)

I lived in Lexington, KY for 14 years and I believe we were among America's leaders in churches, strip clubs, and chain restaurants (per capita, that is).

There's a Portland joke somewhere in here...


From what i heard of people who were at CNN when it was a startup, definitely so.


He put "moral values" in quotes.


The Crunchbase numbers of only 21 startups started since 2008 are grossly misstated, even based on Crunchbase data.

I think I personally know 21 companies started AND funded since then in Atlanta. When I search for individual companies, they show up as "Atlanta, GA" and "Founded 8/2010" (for example), but they don't show up in a search.

I'd expect there are probably at least 100 Atlanta companies in Crunchbase founded since January 2008, and probably over 300 companies founded in that time. A possibly unexpected trait of Atlanta is that our companies aren't super-focused on Crunchbase, Angel List, etc, so we probably under-report on most research like this. (Our own fault - Atlanta companies - spend 10 minutes to add your startup to Crunchbase and Angel List).


I went to Stanford, but picked Atlanta as the place for my startup. All the cons are true--less capital, difficult to find rockstar talent (particularly technical talent), but so are the pros (cheap, healthier business environment, etc). For me, I'm trying to build a values-based organization, and I think it'd be tough (or impossible) to do so effectively in the Bay Area.


Worth mentioning, the ATDC, the Georgia Tech incubator, is actually over 20 years old rather than a new thing as the article implies. They've recently done a lot to improve their handling of early startups, however. Amongst other things, Mindspring went through the ATDC back when they were in their early stages. More interesting things Georgia Tech has done recently include the InVenture Prize (https://inventureprize.gatech.edu ) that encourages students to create new inventions. Winners get patent filings and such. Additionally, they recently created Flashpoint (http://flashpoint.gatech.edu ), a startup accelerator.

Meanwhile, right next to Georgia Tech campus (in the basement of the Biltmore) has sprung up a space that is rapidly becoming a common spot for entrepreneurs (at least those who live around there), Hypepotamus (http://www.hypepotamus.com ). Atlanta Startup Village, a monthly-ish event to let folks share what they're working on, is also held out of Hypepotamus (http://atlantastartupcommunity.wordpress.com/2012/12/07/atla... ).

Culture-wise, Tech itself is on top of Midtown which has plenty of nightlife. Other hotspots include the Old Fourth Ward/Edgewood areas (the sound table, noni's, Church), Virginia Highland (Dark Horse Tavern, Hand in Hand), Buckhead, etc. Old Fourth Ward, Little Five, Edgewood, and other places in Atlanta all have active arts communities (see for example http://fluxprojects.org and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goat_Farm_Arts_Center ). There are several bars to keep an eye on both up-and-coming and better known bands (for example, Smith's Olde Bar), and ~an hour and 15 minutes away is Athens, which has its own thriving arts and music scenes.

I think the trick with Atlanta is nothing is pervasive—you have to know where to look, and it's not necessarily obvious where to do so. But I think if you know where to look, you'll find there's plenty of culture to be had. The good news is, there are many very smart and motivated people working to increase the visibility of both the culture and the startup community of the city. I think we'll increasingly see the effect of these efforts in the near future (indeed, I think they've already begun to have a clear effect).


St. Louis - I recommend St. Louis. Startup culture, associations and opportunities are blowing up.


did anybody manage to read this and have a summary of the point?


Basically, the article says Atlanta is good because the cost of living is cheaper, there is a lot of smart talent due to the educational institutions, and the city is seeing an increase in both communication and transportation infrastructure.

Downsides mentioned (in comparison to the more popular startup cities) are the lack of startup investment capital, not as many people with an entrepreneurship mentality, both of which lead to a less-active startup culture.

However, I wonder what the effects would be if Atlanta becomes a startup hub on par with NY or San Francisco. I rather like the fact that it's cheaper to live in Atlanta than most big cities.

An increase of capital to the local economy would result in rise in the cost of living, which (I believe) is one of oft-cited reasons for moving there. A 3 bedroom townhouse in a very nice residential area for ~$150k isnt unheard of.


Believe me it would take a lot of startups to even make a dent in the amount of available housing at bargain price.

I would be more concerned by the fact that traffic is a nightmare and there is not much hope the state of georgia would ever get their act together and build even a half decent transit infrastructure.


Traffic isn't exactly a picnic in Silicon Valley. And on the traffic front, there is a key advantage to living in Atlanta: while it's not possible to live entirely without a car in the city, it's entirely possible to live close to work inside the city, because rents are so cheap. Traffic inside the city itself really isn't that bad--it's traffic in and out of the city from the suburbs.


I doubt the small increase in capital from bringing in more startups would have a large effect on cost of living.


It would not initially. However, if there are a few big successes, the cost of living would rise. But even then, it would be concentrated in the areas considered attractive to the newly successful company employees and people in the secondary economy serving them.


Unlike NYC and SFO, we are not a port city. We have functionally "infinite spaces for suburbs, and no geographic boundaries". We aren't on the water, and 2-3 directions on the compass you hit forest/fields really fast.

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=google+maps+satellite+atlanta...

I don't think we have the potential even for severe housing cost rises even.


This is a 5 million people area. It would take a handful of Microsoft sized startups to make that needle move.


Red state. 'Nuff said.


How ignorant. Not to mention that the city of Atlanta votes overwhelmingly blue.


Wow that is ignorant.


Austin seems to be doing alright.


It is? What interesting thing has come out of Austin anytime recently?


Guess it depends on definition of interesting and recently.

http://www.austinemerging100.com/list.php

HomeAway and BazaarVoice both just had IPOs. Indeed got bought for likely ~1 billion this year too. Phurnace exited to BMC for ~500 million about 2 years ago, Convio IPO that year. Spiceworks and WhaleShark seem like they are doing pretty well.

SocialWare, AppSumo, Uship, UnboundID, Outbox, Mass Relevance, Boundless, BlackLocus, WPEngine, CopperEgg, SailPoint, etc. I'm sure I'm missing tons, but point is there are lots.


Gowalla


Lots of cool video games.


Why? Everything is purple, remember?


We were the second bluest red state after NC in the last election

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: