Wow if he really did contribute a lot (which I don't doubt at all) then how did Google let him get away? I'd imagine his lifestyle there was pretty nice.
Pretty sure someone like Guido is, at this point, not motivated by money. If there was a challenge he wanted to undertake at Google, I'm sure they'd give it to him already.
He probably wanted to participate in growing another new tech company that has a lot of potential. That's an opportunity Google would find hard to counter.
Sorry, my statement was more generic. I wasn't trying to say that Guido is motivated by money, just that these are common ways to get someone to stay if that is indeed the issue that makes them want to leave.
On the issue of challenges, maybe Guido has more pull on this, but there were recently some articles/discussion on HN about Google's hiring practices. They might hire you based on your PhD in databases, and then have you writing shell scripts for work because some randomized 'sorting hat' tells you what group you end up in. It's possible that even Guido doesn't have enough pull at Google to overcome this. :-\
If you want to move to another team at Google, it's really up to that team if they want you. As long as they have budget for you, and they want you working with them, then you're free to move.
The problem with new hires is that no other team has any idea whether you're any good, so it take a bit of tenure to prove yourself and make yourself known to others.
I'm quite sure Guido would be doing whatever he wanted at Google
The discussion I'm referring to represented ending up somewhere that you don't want to be as a bit of a trap.
E.g. if Guido ends up writing shell scripts, but his real skill-set/passion is for databases. It's quite possible for him to under-perform, and then that performance used as a reason for the 'database team' to not take him.
Yeah but the problem is, reasons for a career change are highly personal, and by the time the employee wants to leave, it's usually already too late to keep them by sweetening the deal. The only way to know is to ask Guido himself.
In any company there could be changes that are simply imposible to fulfil. Let's say that there is something on the company culture he don't like. You can't call upper management and say "I can't stand the level of politics on this company". Or the way we hire. Or the kind of products we are doing. Or the impact I have on the company (no single person is going to have a big impact at Google, no matter how great he is)...
There are also things related to company size. I am more confortable working for small companies than big ones, there are other people that is the other way around...
It's not as simple as saying: "please stay, whatever you want"
Probably nothing. I just find it interesting that an organization like Google with practically unlimited resources can't keep someone (who can probably get anything they want in terms of perks) around.
