Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Being a dick in general is not criminal. Being a dick by stealing 100K private emails and giving them to press, apparently, is criminal.



But it's not stealing if AT&T was just happily giving them away. Which they were.


Is that still defensible if you go out of your way to brute force download as many as you can and you then distribute that list?


That's like saying that it isn't robbery if the door was unlocked.

It still is. Any reasonable person would know that stealing from a house, locked or no, isn't something they're supposed to be doing.

It's a quandary, to be sure, because once you discover a hypothetical exploit, it's human nature to sate that curiosity by testing whether it works. Two or three accounts would have proved it, 100,000 accounts is excessive.

I'm not trying to say that the number of accounts he released is germane to the discussion per se, but I certainly think that it's relevant in the discussion of intent.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: