> archive.today has a documented history of altering the archived content Wow, I...

JasonADrury · 2026-03-22T11:37:18 1774179438

Archive.org has an even worse history of this, FWIW.

It allows website owners and third parties to tamper with archived content.

Look here, for example: https://web.archive.org/web/20140701040026/http://echo.msk.r...

Archive.today is by far the best option available.

echoangle · 2026-03-22T22:08:25 1774217305

What does this example show? It shows „ad blocker detected“ for me.

_osud · 2026-03-23T05:40:11 1774244411

Archived page from 2014 gets tampered with by this javascript from 2022: https://web.archive.org/web/20220912152218/http://echobanner...

Unless you're very technical, web.archive.org is completely untrustworthy

pschastain · 2026-03-22T23:51:25 1774223485

Deflection rather than addressing the actual accusation

Pay attention to this type of behavior, folks. It's revealing

_osud · 2026-03-23T05:18:45 1774243125

What do you want me to address? I'm just pointing out that there are no great archival services, and the only real alternative to archive.today is worse.

>Pay attention to this type of behavior, folks. It's revealing

What does it reveal?

AlexeyBelov · 2026-03-23T06:55:15 1774248915

Lmao, did you just start bickering with yourself?

Or, wow, you just revealed your second account.

mafuy · 2026-03-23T09:13:13 1774257193

Yea, reading through the page, these two accounts have been sounding exactly the same. I suppose it is in line with the childish behavior of AT.

_osud · 2026-03-23T09:57:34 1774259854

[flagged]

AlexeyBelov · 2026-03-23T14:32:43 1774276363

Reported you to mods via email.

_osud · 2026-03-23T15:13:23 1774278803

Oh great, I might have to click "New Identity" in Tor Browser.