Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Huh? The point of the article is that we should use git to store an LLMs output as it works?

How do any of the quotes and citations used coherently form that argument?

What is this writing style? Why does it feel like it doesn't want me to understand what the heck it's saying?



The point of the argument is that meaning emerges in conversation. A session between human and AI is a conversation.

Current AI storage paradigms offer lateral memory across the time axis. What exists around me?

A bit branch is longitudinal memory across the time axis. What exists behind me?

Persist type checked decision trees within it. Your git history just became a tamper-proof, reproducible O(1) decision tree. Execution becomes a tree walk.

It works. And it's not production ready yet.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: