Kind of ridiculous. Samsung obviously did copy, the court just ruled that it did...

spullara on Nov 1, 2012 | parent | context | favorite | on: Apple told to rewrite "Samsung didn't copy", post ...

Kind of ridiculous. Samsung obviously did copy, the court just ruled that it didn't merit an infringement ruling. I mean, does anyone think, really, that Samsung didn't set out to copy all of Apple's products? Wouldn't it be better for all (except Apple) if it was spelled out that Samsung copied them but it is ok?

YokoZar on Nov 1, 2012 [–]

Not even the American jury thought that Samsung violated Apple's patent on the product in question.