Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why? Because anyone I think was victimized by someone else must legally not be culpable for their own actions?

It would be neat if the world worked that way.



In your opinion, was he aware of the nature of his actions, and the nature of their potential consequences?


I think he was fully aware of the nature of his actions but incorrect in his expectations as to how he would be perceived. In the chats between Lamo and Manning it was apparent he thought he'd be seen as some sort of hero for his actions by the majority of the US population. Obviously this isn't the case.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: