Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This feels very counter to Twitter's claimed intent in rolling out the new policies.

IFTTT is in no way trying compete as a Twitter client, and, especially in the case where I'm trying to archive my own Tweets, the service only enhances my Twitter experience.

Twitter's throwing a lot away in the name of squeezing more value out of its assets.




If the ship's going down, you start throwing everything away you can to keep it afloat.


Twitter just moved into a new office, has been acquiring companies (remember, they're what drove Instagram's price up), and you really think they're secretly cash-strapped or something?


No definitely not, but the problem is that the clock is ticking and I think the FB IPO showed them what can happen when the right pieces aren't in place at the time of IPO.

No one is going to argue that Twitter has a technological advantage - their service is incredibly simple and could probably be completely replicated by a small team in six months to a year. Moreso than Facebook, they are relying on the network effect but the also monetize less than Facebook, so who really knows if they're ever going to be profitable?


How about you pulling your tweets into Linkedin feed? Didn't twitter revoked Linkedin's official API access?

p.s. I don't use IFTTT but this is my guess.


I see your point.

Would I be violating Twitter's policies if automated a process whereby, when I compose a Tweet, the words I write (which are my own) appear simultaneously on something other than Twitter? Is it the round-tripping through their API that has Twitter's undies in a bundle? Because I could just skip that part entirely.


You should just skip it regardless. It's fairly obvious that Twitter has become a bad actor and should be removed from the content and communication pipeline.

AT&T used to dictate which phones you could connect to their network, too, and that was also a terrible idea.


Best way of putting it that I've seen. These recent moves serve to alienate developers (and users by extension) and reek of typical corporate desperation.

Show's over folks.


I seem to recall they now have a policy specifically forbidding Twitter client applications from simultaneously posting to other services, so you probably would be violating their new rules.


I completely agree with this. And Twitter is now leeching the benefits off of IFTTT without giving anything in return.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: