Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In truth pretty much every language's GC is worse than the JVM's.



Lisp implementations have had excellent GCs that are broadly better than the JVM for years.


Do you have a source for that? I could see a purely functional language creating much less garbage than Java and/or providing much easier escape analysis scenarios, leading to better performance, but I'd be very surprised to see them perform better for similar amounts of heap allocation, given all the work that went into the various Java GC algorithms. I mean, those LISP GCs probably predate wide adoption of threading, right?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: