Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In the US, you are contractually responsible for whatever is done with your connection. But that's not a legal distinction. You might be throttled or disconnected, but you won't get a criminal record.

Edit: in some ways it's worse because there are no courts involved, so there is not always any reasonable way to defend yourself.



Two interesting news stories today related to this in the US:

A judge showing surprising common sense that, even in civil cases, you are not necessarily responsible for someone else using your connection.[1]

The RIAA continuing their campaign of ruining peoples lives over a few shared music files [2]

[1] http://gizmodo.com/5943025/you-are-officially-not-responsibl...

[2] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/11/thomas_rasset_loses_...


JTR is a bit of a special case though.. she willfully and knowingly infringed copyrights (and this has been affirmed through at least 4 appeals that I know of).

The MafiAA knows they'll never get that judgement.. it's just to make a point. Besides that, any decent court will allow you to work out a payment plan. (I say this as someone who has been sued for absurd amounts of money before!)

It's annoying, unethical, disgusting, and a lot of other mean things, but hardly life ruining.


That second case has been going on for years. I don't think the RIAA has brought more people to court lately.


He didn't get a criminal record either (unlike infrigement, it's not a crime not to "secure" your connection).


Regular copyright infringement is a tort and not a crime either.


Yet... Only one step after this: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4506385




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: