Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Just because air pollution is bad, doesn’t mean it is bad in this way. It could just as easily be that some other lifestyle thing is causing dementia AND leading to living in areas with worse pm2.5.

Especially since pm2.5 tends to be higher in areas with higher population densities, near roads, industrial areas, etc.

Hell, maybe the underlying major risk factor is actually time spent in the car. Or repeated viral exposures of a specific type. Or a specific type of air pollution.

Either way, it’s not like everyone is going to be moving out of high pm2.5 areas anytime soon, or that we’ll be able to just solve the sources of pollution right now even if it is the cause.



How is pm2.5 not something we can have a direct impact on based on environmental laws?


Ask California and all the wildfires.


How is wildfire frequency and severity not directly impacted by regulation?


Wildfires are already illegal in California. As is producing a lot of noxious smoke! They even have an entire (rather large) government division (CALFIRE) responsible for stopping them.

For some reason, nature DGAF.

Or do you have some other policy proposal? Banning lightning or fire perhaps? Making trees illegal?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: