Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>Logical positivism is flawed because the principle of verification cannot be verified.

Why not? It works, thus it verifies itself.



So do an infinite number of sets of statements which include a false one. Circular arguments are obviously not reliable.


That's a hypothesis of a counterexample, though, not a fact of a counterexample.


It's not working if it excludes subjective experience by definition. Makes it useless for the consciousness debate.


It doesn't exclude subjective experience.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: