Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
zaik
3 months ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Ch.at – A lightweight LLM chat service accessible ...
It seems like the only internet protocols they didn't implement were the ones designed for chat. How could they forget about IRC, XMPP and SIP?
bravesoul2
3 months ago
|
next
[–]
No SOAP, CORBA, WAP or RS232 interfaces either.
nosioptar
3 months ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Lousy infidels snubbed the almighty telnet as well.
mannyv
3 months ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[–]
Tn3270 FTW!
evbogue
3 months ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
This is because when an account generates text in a chatroom it is generally referred to as a "bot".
progval
3 months ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
They can create chatrooms dynamically so no one but the user will see them.
evbogue
3 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
That's wise, but how will the user protect against the host in those protos?
progval
3 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Protect against the host doing what?
etaioinshrdlu
3 months ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
These can definitely be added
precommunicator
3 months ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
Or IP over Avian Carriers or HTCPCP
hkt
3 months ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
I'd love a deltachat bot too..
anthk
3 months ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
It's trivial to bind a text output with socat to a mail account or IRC with ii.
urbandw311er
3 months ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
Great observation
stephenlf
3 months ago
|
prev
[–]
SMTP!
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: