Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Typically, when people talk about "long" and "short" vowels they are referring to a combination of duration and pronunciation (e.g. English "bat" vs. "bate"), and that appears to be the case here as well.

Finnish vowels and most Hungarian vowels come in short-long pairs that

  - only their lengths differ, their pronunciations do not (meaning: IPA denotes them with the same letter but with or without a colon)
  - their lengths are *phonemic*, that is they are *said to be* different phonemes, they are *perceived as* different phonemes, and there are example words that differ only at them
You can observe this property in the table I've linked for i, o, ö, u, ü [0]. You can find minimal pairs for them at [1]. (Note that [1] groups these vowel pairs as "Vowels with length difference: I – Í | O – Ó | Ö – Ő | U – Ú | Ü – Ű" which does not include A - Á and E - É.)

A-á and e-é are not such pairs. They differ in pronunciation (see the IPA in [0]), and their lengths, while are somewhat defined, never contrast (no minimal pairs for them). Also you can pronounce any of these four with arbitrary length, it will stay the same phoneme.

[0] : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_phonology#Vowel_exam...

[1] : https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Hungarian_minimal_pa...

edit: I find your previous quote 'misleading'. I would say 'wrong', but it avoids to say anything factual. At least in out of context--the rest of the wiki page clarifies everything.



So yeah, we are talking about different things.

Your position sounds cogent and may well be a more accurate description of Hungarian (e.g. that its long/short vowels are more like Latin than English). I don't know Hungarian, so I can't say.

The rest of this thread is consistent with people assuming the broader definition of long/short.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: