Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> People need to remember that the default for real estate is to fall into disrepair and turn back into the dust of the earth; as someone who owns real estate, you are responsible for fighting that entropy,

And that costs money. However, it still costs money as a renter, because whatever the house costs to keep, the landlord is going to pass that cost on to the renter.

There is no landlord renting at a loss.





> There is no landlord renting at a loss.

Actually not true. Landlords are just as susceptible to speculation as everyone else and just as capable of not doing the math as everyone else. There are plenty of landlords who are taking a loss on the monthly rent compared to their mortgage bill because they can't find anyone to rent at a price where they would break even on the mortgage, and refuse to sell because they're speculating that housing prices will rise faster than their losses, and/or that the losses are simply part of the cost of building equity.


Exactly. Real estate is highly emotional and irrational.

I personally know a ton of people that are keeping a house and renting it out at a loss (because of the market rate), because they cannot seem to emotionally agree to sell that house. This happens way more with real estate than with anything else. Half of the time they don't even realize they are losing money, the other half of the time they don't want to know they are losing money.


You need to review your assumptions.

> There is no landlord renting at a loss.

there absolutely is. Again, most people don't do the math. It's no different for their rental property. They think it is "worth it".

> the landlord is going to pass that cost on to the renter.

Nope, there are a lot of studies on this. Rental prices are defined by offer and demand, not by costs for the landlord.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: