> You have taken this all very personally. I apologize for offering a different take on system design than what you apparently believe in very strongly?
No, you haven't offered anything other than "you should use Redis". You started with "if you are caching in sessions". I don't know where you get the idea the sessions are caches.
> The systems we've built have served over-billion-page-view months. That's not common or easy.
Good for you. But have you actually used local storage for storing user specific data? And have you compared using redis and memcached for session storage? I don't have a problem with difference in opinion - it's just that your opinions aren't valid.
You are way in over your head.
> You have taken this all very personally. I apologize for offering a different take on system design than what you apparently believe in very strongly?
No, you haven't offered anything other than "you should use Redis". You started with "if you are caching in sessions". I don't know where you get the idea the sessions are caches.
> The systems we've built have served over-billion-page-view months. That's not common or easy.
Good for you. But have you actually used local storage for storing user specific data? And have you compared using redis and memcached for session storage? I don't have a problem with difference in opinion - it's just that your opinions aren't valid.