Then it should have only been removed from the Australian storefront, rather than the payment processors forcing its removal worldwide. The payment processors shouldn't have been involved at all.
Wherever a good or service is legal, a global duopoly of payment processors should be forced to process payments for it.
Yes. The article does quote the complainants saying that they tried contacting steam and only after getting no response for months contacted the payment providers. Steam could have delisted in Austria but didn't.
Wherever a good or service is legal, a global duopoly of payment processors should be forced to process payments for it.