Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Aside from possibly hurting the W3C Validator's feelings, does that matter?



Some companies policies require validation and they require specs that are nailed down. In those cases you'd end up using HTML <5 and that won't validate with data-x.


I understand the allure of an objective way to evaluate the "quality" of your code... but that seems ridiculously naive. I'm pretty confident I could come up with something that uses features in the spec that nobody ever implemented, so it would be fully validated and correct and yet totally nonfunctional for actual users.


I'm curious why you wouldn't use <!doctype html>? Are you using something in XHTML that's deprecated in HTML5? Those are few and far between.


In that case, decline to work with said company.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: