Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I have an issue with attributing any problems to "screen time" in general. It seems like there are real observable differences based on what it is we're doing with the screen.

Personally, I use computers for work, for reading/research/writing, for news, for gaming, for creating music, and for passive entertainment. They all feel qualitatively very different. I have a hard time adding up all the hours and calling it "screen time". 20 hours reading a good book or editing an audio track is far healthier than 2 hours of doomscrolling.

> “Children are spending more and more time on screens, for everything from entertainment to homework to messaging friends,”

Yes. And it's the algorithmic curated feed that's destroying messaging. And the advertisements and garbage content of the entertainment industry. And AI largely eroding our ability to think critically. None of that has to do with screens themselves.

Maybe instead of "screen time" we should differentiate on a number of axes: Passive vs. active. Creating vs. consuming. Social vs solo. Mediated by algorithms vs mediated by social norms. Not all screen time is created equal, and some may actually be socially net positive.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: