It was an observation, not a detailed analysis. This would suggest that I quickly scanned the page, came to a similarly quick conclusion, and posted about it. We might call this 'reactionary'.
It would not suggest examining the minutiae of every picture to determine whether or not they were more concerned with the female form than the event itself.
It would then stand to reason that my observation could be inaccurate. My mini-rant is still free to stand though, since I've noticed that personally, even if it's not sexually oriented.
It would not suggest examining the minutiae of every picture to determine whether or not they were more concerned with the female form than the event itself.
It would then stand to reason that my observation could be inaccurate. My mini-rant is still free to stand though, since I've noticed that personally, even if it's not sexually oriented.