Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Misreading a number seems incredibly insignificant to the number of outright idiotic things Mr Trump says on a daily basis. Why the disparity in expectation/response?


> Misreading a number

Simple misreading is not the issue.

The misread number was almost two thirds of the entire population. That's the sort of thing I'd expect someone to catch as they're saying it because of how absurd it is.


Meanwhile, the Trump administration claimed to have saved 258 American lives with their drug busts. In contrast to Harris, who I'm sure realised her mistake and would've corrected it if asked about it, the Trump admin actually believes their number and doubled down on it.

Harris misspoke. Trump believes the majority of the American population would have died in 2025 had he not been in office.


Trump believes people are born with a set number of heartbeats [1], hence why he doesn't exercise. To save them for later.

Is that something you'd expect POTUS to catch because of "how absurd it is" or not?

[1] https://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/15/politics/donald-trump-exe...


So misreading it and not immediately catching it is the issue? It seems incredibly human. And you really feel this is worse than the dumb things Mr Trump is on record as saying?


One shouldn't measure excellence solely by ones distance relative to catastrophe.

Being better than shit doesn't mean good.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: