Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're the one doing the gaslighting now. "It doesn't work for me, therefore it can't possibly work for anyone else."


At this point you should just take this as your secret weapon. Let people convince each other that AI can't do that thing, while you are one-shotting the exact thing with a cost of $0.05.


Which is a very reasonable conclusion given the kinds of errors it makes.

Why are you so defensive about the tech?

Involved in any AI startups, perhaps?


Most of them are involved (including the latest round of YC startups), who have VCs invested in them to boost "AI agents" all over the internet and ignoring the laughable errors it makes.

Here are some headlines:

OpenAI explains why ChatGPT became too sycophantic [0]

Anthropic blames Claude AI for ‘embarrassing and unintentional mistake’ in legal filing [1]

xAI blames Grok’s obsession with white genocide on an ‘unauthorized modification’ [2]

So you see, these AI models can easily be prone to producing nonsensical errors unpredictably at any time.

[0] https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/29/openai-explains-why-chatgp...

[1] https://www.theverge.com/news/668315/anthropic-claude-legal-...

[2] https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/15/xai-blames-groks-obsession...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: