Thanks, I'll stand partially corrected. It was a badly written comment, or muddled thoughts, or both. I didn't mean to doubt the existence of superposition or our ability to achieve it for sustained periods.
But doesn't the point stand? I meant to say that none of the examples seem to demonstrate both 1) and 2). Do we know of any natural system which can maintain and precisely manipulate a quantum state like a quantum computer needs to?
But doesn't the point stand? I meant to say that none of the examples seem to demonstrate both 1) and 2). Do we know of any natural system which can maintain and precisely manipulate a quantum state like a quantum computer needs to?