Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Sure there is - evaluate the candidates actual skill level without the ability to use automated tools.

The current and old school way is a proctored exam.






Testing doesn’t work for everything, especially for dissertations, publications, research etc. That being said I’m wholeheartedly in favor of using extensive in class testing when applicable.

It works for enough that 99% of cheaters are weeded out. Perfection is the enemy of "good enough".

Also, always keep in mind the most underrated kind of cheater: the clearly smart kid who cheats to go from an A- to an A. That level of student can't be "caught" with tests because by all accounts they already know and have even mastered the material. The pressure at that level of competitiveness simply requires zero room for doubt. Not really what the article is about, but some food for thought.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: