"lacks even the most basic" implies that we don't have the higher stuff too. That in turn implies that we don't have any. All of which is false, based on the earlier links that I provided. Are you saying that those are lies? (Also anyone can google that info for themselves.) Then be open about it, and say so directly.
That was such a global, wide-ranging and patently false and pretty insulting statement (even if ignorantly done) that you made about Indian manufacturing.
Many top Indian multi-hundred-crore-or-multi-thousand-crore turnover (in rupees) industrialists or groups like the Tatas, Birlas, Bajajs, Singhanias, Thapars, Godrejs, TVS group, TTK group, Munjals, Ambanis, Premjis, and many more, may like to have a word with you, or rather, would smile and giggle at your ignorance.
And now you try to weasel your way out of it by saying, in the comment above that I am replying to:
>I never said we don't manufacture.
Those two statements are clearly quite contradictory.
Laughable.
Even your first paragraph above is wrong.
I have had enough of your false arguments. If I feel like it, I may point out what is wrong with that, later, otherwise not.
And about this:
>There are few notable industries that we are decent at and export it as well:
Maybe check out the difference between "few" and "a few", which have opposite meanings (a mistake that Indians often make), and at the same time, improve your English grammar generally.
Can't help but post another link, related to what I said above:
>Many top Indian multi-hundred-crore-or-multi-thousand-crore turnover (in rupees) industrialists or groups like the Tatas, Birlas, Bajajs, Singhanias, Thapars, Godrejs, TVS group, TTK group, Munjals, Ambanis, Premjis, and many more, may like to have a word with you, or rather, would smile and giggle at your ignorance.
Not all of those are about manufacturing, but many are.
Their combined total revenue adds up to hundreds, if not thousands, of billions of US dollars, going by a simple conversion of thousand crore rupees to USD that I just did in Google.
>India lacks even the most basic manufacturing.
"lacks even the most basic" implies that we don't have the higher stuff too. That in turn implies that we don't have any. All of which is false, based on the earlier links that I provided. Are you saying that those are lies? (Also anyone can google that info for themselves.) Then be open about it, and say so directly.
That was such a global, wide-ranging and patently false and pretty insulting statement (even if ignorantly done) that you made about Indian manufacturing.
Many top Indian multi-hundred-crore-or-multi-thousand-crore turnover (in rupees) industrialists or groups like the Tatas, Birlas, Bajajs, Singhanias, Thapars, Godrejs, TVS group, TTK group, Munjals, Ambanis, Premjis, and many more, may like to have a word with you, or rather, would smile and giggle at your ignorance.
And now you try to weasel your way out of it by saying, in the comment above that I am replying to:
>I never said we don't manufacture.
Those two statements are clearly quite contradictory.
Laughable.
Even your first paragraph above is wrong.
I have had enough of your false arguments. If I feel like it, I may point out what is wrong with that, later, otherwise not.
And about this:
>There are few notable industries that we are decent at and export it as well:
Maybe check out the difference between "few" and "a few", which have opposite meanings (a mistake that Indians often make), and at the same time, improve your English grammar generally.
”it" is used for singular, not plural nouns.