Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If watermarks are thing, and the judge just doesn’t like this one because he finds it disrespectful, that sounds like a first amendment issue.


Contempt findings are subject to the 1st amendment, but criminal speech acts are not protected by the 1st amendment.

Arguably, the dragon exhibits a trespass against the dignity of the court itself.


“Dignity” is just racism in disguise.


Racism may be that which denies one's inherent human dignity based on ethnicity.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: