If they only differ by a dot, this could be legitimate papers being translated poorly. I don't see what the big deal is. Is the suggestion that these journal articles just AI garbage? I thought the editorial boards were supposed to be able to put a stop to that.

I'm assuming they are using LLMs for translation, which makes this mistake as it already knows about "vegetative electron microscopy".

Asked an Iranian-German electron microscopist that I know.

Scanning = robeshi

Vegetative = royeshi

Probably just a typo. Scanning electron microscopes (SEM) are very common instruments.

this is in the article