> He and people like him propped up the political weaponisation of "antisemitism" in order to attack legitimate protest
Attacking legitimate protest is fine? Like, the KKK are allowed to legitimately demonstrate. And I'm allowed to say they're terrible. That's speech. That's debate.
> They enabled Trump to do this and now they are trying really hard to differentiate themselves from the fascists
Clubs and departments calling for the eradication of a nation-state is nothing new, we've been drawing lines on maps thousands of miles away since Sykes and Picot and before. People opposing those clubs is nothing new. What is novel is the state getting so involved in suppressing it, at least in post-WWII America.
Attacking legitimate protest is fine? Like, the KKK are allowed to legitimately demonstrate. And I'm allowed to say they're terrible. That's speech. That's debate.
> They enabled Trump to do this and now they are trying really hard to differentiate themselves from the fascists
Clubs and departments calling for the eradication of a nation-state is nothing new, we've been drawing lines on maps thousands of miles away since Sykes and Picot and before. People opposing those clubs is nothing new. What is novel is the state getting so involved in suppressing it, at least in post-WWII America.