Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think what they mean is what they say unless proven otherwise. Attributing dishonesty to someone without any evidence is passé.





The last 10 years of how Facebook operates show how naive a view this is to take of Zucc

I think Lucy is going to let Charlie Brown kick the football this time

If you don't see heaps of evidence you haven't been paying attention. Not for a long time.

You should really only get one pass for human rights violations before skepticism is the default response. Facebook already used theirs on genocide. After something like that, why should the public give them any benefit of the doubt?

Taking Zuckerberg at his word is beyond naive, it is moronic.



Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: