Its up to interviewers but discussed matters can be checked quickly (ah you claim 10 years java backend integration experience? Ok lets dig deep. If reality is (almost) 0 thats lying in plain view).
Also not sure you understand english language, greatly exaggerating or making up stuff is still same lying, details are irrelevant.
No it’s not the same. But at this point I’m pretty sure you don’t understand the concept of nuance.
Sure, 10 vs 0 years is obvious. Why even bring up such an example?
What about 7 vs 10 or 3 vs 5? Maybe it’s technically lying but who cares if it works out at the end? What do these numbers even mean? A person who has 3 years of experience in Java can be better than someone who technically has 5..
Especially when those N years requirements are not necessarily put in there by the people who you’re actually going to work in.
Also not sure you understand english language, greatly exaggerating or making up stuff is still same lying, details are irrelevant.