Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Single Thread Efficiency (Oryon Mobile)- Bilbili
There seems to a reviewer on bilbili (S White Database) who reviewed Single Thread power consumption/efficiency for the Qualcomm Oryon core using Geekbench 6.
The Oryon core scores 3261 while consuming 7.6W of power.
Dimensity scores 2901 while consuming 7.9W of power.
A18 pro scores 3568 while consuming 6.6W of power.
Looking at the graph, it seems that at an iso power of 7.6W, Oryon has a ~15% performance advantage over the Cortex X925.
At iso performance, Oryon matches Dimensity’s score while using ~2.5-3 less watts of power.
Compared to the A18 pro, Apple seems to retain a sizable P/W lead. 540.6 points/W (A18 Pro) compared to 429.07 points/W (Oryon). Translates to a 25% P/W advantage.
Looking at iso power however, the gap closes, Apple retains a 15% lead over the Oryon core.
Unable to compare iso performance since A18 pro has a single data point, but considering the lead over Dimensity is similar, it is likely Apple is similarly 30-40% more efficient at iso performance.
Impressive showing by Qualcomm.
Metric D9400 8 Elite A18 Pro
Geekbench 6 ST 2901 3261 3568
Clock speed 3.63 GHz 4.32 GHz 4.04 GHz
Power consumption 7.9W 7.6W 6.6W
P-core Area 3.2 mm² 2.2 mm² 2.9 mm²
Performance-per-clock 799 770 883
Performance-per-watt 367 429 540
Performance-per-area 906 1482 1230
PPC : Apple > Mediatek > Qualcomm.
PPW : Apple > Qualcomm > Mediatek.
PPA : Qualcomm > Apple > Mediatek.
Apple and Qualcomm only includes L1 as L2 are shared.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Single Thread Efficiency (Oryon Mobile)- Bilbili
There seems to a reviewer on bilbili (S White Database) who reviewed Single Thread power consumption/efficiency for the Qualcomm Oryon core using Geekbench 6.
https://imgur.com/a/vqtIWz0
The Oryon core scores 3261 while consuming 7.6W of power.
Dimensity scores 2901 while consuming 7.9W of power.
A18 pro scores 3568 while consuming 6.6W of power.
Looking at the graph, it seems that at an iso power of 7.6W, Oryon has a ~15% performance advantage over the Cortex X925.
At iso performance, Oryon matches Dimensity’s score while using ~2.5-3 less watts of power.
Compared to the A18 pro, Apple seems to retain a sizable P/W lead. 540.6 points/W (A18 Pro) compared to 429.07 points/W (Oryon). Translates to a 25% P/W advantage.
Looking at iso power however, the gap closes, Apple retains a 15% lead over the Oryon core.
Unable to compare iso performance since A18 pro has a single data point, but considering the lead over Dimensity is similar, it is likely Apple is similarly 30-40% more efficient at iso performance.
Impressive showing by Qualcomm.
Metric D9400 8 Elite A18 Pro
Geekbench 6 ST 2901 3261 3568
Clock speed 3.63 GHz 4.32 GHz 4.04 GHz
Power consumption 7.9W 7.6W 6.6W
P-core Area 3.2 mm² 2.2 mm² 2.9 mm²
Performance-per-clock 799 770 883
Performance-per-watt 367 429 540
Performance-per-area 906 1482 1230
PPC : Apple > Mediatek > Qualcomm.
PPW : Apple > Qualcomm > Mediatek.
PPA : Qualcomm > Apple > Mediatek.
Apple and Qualcomm only includes L1 as L2 are shared.
Mediatek includes L2.