> If gender really is a spectrum, doesn’t this mean that every individual alive is non-binary, by definition? If so, then the label ‘non-binary’ to describe a specific gender identity would become redundant, because it would fail to pick out a special category of people.
The polarity of the spectrum and its distribution are easy to guess, because of the 2 majorities, but hard to pinpoint for a non-binary person. The author proceeds to state that such a comparison of "how much more of a woman someone is" is actually possible. As if gender shaped brains or other non-obvious dimensions of the spectrum do not exist.
The article is heavily biased and full of leading questions like this. Dont read it, if you are personally effected. All it does is hallucinating some logical flaws but never really disproves the spectrum, because you cant argue against different hormone levels, i guess.
The polarity of the spectrum and its distribution are easy to guess, because of the 2 majorities, but hard to pinpoint for a non-binary person. The author proceeds to state that such a comparison of "how much more of a woman someone is" is actually possible. As if gender shaped brains or other non-obvious dimensions of the spectrum do not exist.
The article is heavily biased and full of leading questions like this. Dont read it, if you are personally effected. All it does is hallucinating some logical flaws but never really disproves the spectrum, because you cant argue against different hormone levels, i guess.