This doesn’t make sense as an analysis. Financial journalist didn’t know how factories, steam engines, websites, data centers, or cryptocurrency worked either.
Okay, let me increase the resolution. Financial analyst and Gizmodo are not exactly a pair. Quite frankly, Financial analyst and CNBC or Bloomberg are not exactly a couple either. Those things don't go together.
As in, which of the following does not belong in the group:
1. Gizmodo
2. CNBC
3. Bloomberg
4. Financial Analyst
You might think it's Gizmodo, but it's not. The first three are the same is my point, and there's no way a financial analyst is even there (let alone a technical one that knows about AI). Now what if I told you the thing you thought doesn't belong there (Gizmodo) and the thing I'm telling you doesn't belong there (Financial Analyst) are in the same place? You should be confounded, it's ridiculous (Gizmodo Financial Analyst, huh?). My last sentence is the best joke of the year, trust me on that.
They have no credibility across the board (across all three of those things) is sort of the criticism.
