Curious conclusions. Which data do you base this on? US median income is 5th in the world. There's Luxembourg, Norway and Switzerland before it. Consumer electronics are quite similarly priced in both places once you take sales tax into account in the US. Not to mention it's odd to talk about "European prices" in the first place. There's no euroblock-wide price fixing going on.
Average yearly salary in the US is about 60k, while in the EU average it's about 37k so of course the US as a market has a much higher spending power than the EU. Sure, individual markets like Luxemburg and Norway might be richer than the US average but they're also orders of magnitude smaller markets than the whole US. Scale matters.
Prices in the EU are higher for the same things.
Why then do you think Apple launched the Vision Pro only in the US and not in Europe if you think everything is the same? Why do gaming consoles first launch in the US and only after in Europe if the market is the same according to you?
It seems like the consumer electronics manufacturers know the markets better than you when they base their sales and marketing decisions.
>There's no euroblock-wide price fixing going on.
There is, it's called MSRP and manufactures have one for USA, Canada, EU, UK at every major product launch.
You're arguing statistics and simultaneously need the difference between "median" and "average" explained to you. Sorry if I don't regard you as an authority of any kind.
Do you think if I were to switch the comparison from avenge vs average to median vs median, the gap would be significantly smaller to completely nullify my point on why major consumer electronics launches are always prioritized in the US and also why they enjoy more sales there vs the EU market?
You needlessly insist on pointless semantics in hopes of scoring a cheap "gotcha" over an argument you already lost while my point wasn't to prove you wrong but to share the truth.
