Meaning you think they be more employable than I expect (because them not being employed would represent a just world or something else)? I mostly don't think they'll be employable because they don't seem like they can function very well, but obviously if they do end up more capable than I expect there's no reason to think that toxicity is enough to prevent accomplishment.
I don't think it's bias when I'm aware of actual incidents. Obviously I could be wrong and these incidents aren't long run indicators, and obviously some proportion will likely eventually end up okay because nothing is set in stone.
But when kids are doing things that would get adults jailed I don't think it's bias, though. It's more like a depressing probability.
Many bullies go on to become leaders and get high positions, and it isn't rare for sex scandals with leaders etc. So no such things aren't really god indicators for how they do in a job market.
Of course you don't want people to do that anyway, but being nice and being competent are two completely separate things.